 |
| Chief Justice Roberts |
If you are one of the people who readily swallowed hook-line-and-sinker on face value WITHOUT fully analyzing the news media's report on John Roberts' decision about ObamaCare, the below article is especially important for you to read and understand!
If you are a right-wing conservative. . .before you criticize and/or plan to harm Chief Justice Roberts or his family, it’s important that you think carefully about the meaning – the true nature — of his ruling on ObamaCare.
If you are a left-wing Liberal and Obama's party and are shouting that you won and that ObamaCare was upheld and all the rest. . .well, rejoice all you want because it will be a short-lived celebration.
The truth is: what really actually occurred in Roberts' ruling is payback. Yes, payback for Obama’s previous numerous, ill-advised and childish insults directed toward SCOTUS [or the Supreme Court of the USA].
Chief Justice Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That’s how the Democrats got ObamaCare going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling meant that Congress can not compel American citizens to purchase anything. Ever! The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.
Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the ability to mandate to fund ObamaCare, it must rely on its power to tax. Therefore, the mechanism that funds ObamaCare is a tax. This is also critical.
Recall back during the initial ObamaCare battles, the Democrats called it a penalty, while the Republicans called it a tax. Democrats consistently soft sold it as a penalty. It went to vote as a penalty. Obama declared endlessly, that it was not a tax, it was a penalty. But when the Democrats argued in front of the Supreme Court, they said "hey, a penalty or a tax, either way". So, Roberts gave them a tax.
It is now the official law of the land — beyond word-play and silly shenanigans that Obama-Care is to be funded by tax dollars.
Democrats now must defend a tax increase to justify the ObamaCare law.
Finally, he struck down as unconstitutional, the ObamaCare idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through ObamaCare, basically said to the States — "comply with ObamaCare or we will stop existing funding." Roberts ruled that is a no-no. If a State takes the money, fine, the Feds can tell the state how to run a program, but if the state refuses money, the federal government can not penalize the State by yanking other funding. Therefore, a State can decline to participate in ObamaCare without penalty. This is obviously a serious problem. Are we going to have 10, 12, 25 states not participating in “national” health-care? Suddenly, it’s not national, is it?
Ultimately, Roberts supported the States' rights by limiting the federal government’s coercive abilities. He ruled that the government can not force the people to purchase products or services under the commerce clause and he forced the liberals to have to come clean and admit that ObamaCare is funded by tax increases.
Although he didn’t guarantee Romney a win, he certainly did more than his part and should be applauded.
And he did this without creating a civil war or having bricks thrown threw his windshield. Oh, and he’ll be home in time for dinner.
Roberts' decision was brilliant. Unfortunately, the majority of readers, especially the liberals, and news media reporters completely missed Roberts' vital decision points! -Source Unknown
No comments:
Post a Comment